Bristol Brigand?
(updated 1 Mar 2000)
I still think the wreck could belong to a Brigand, and present the following pictures
below for comparison and conjecture.
Note: All pictures of the wreck were apparently
taken with a 'Fisheye' lens which may distort the actual
shapes of the respective subjects.
|
The picture above shows an exhaust peering out from under a cowling
Caption: Last of the great Bristol piston engines, the Centaurus went into production in this form in 1943 as the 2,520-hp Mk V, with rear exhaust stacks for close cowling.
Undercarriage leg looks identical to that of the Bristol Brigand
Bristol Brigand, First Production type Close-up |
|
I can't help but think the undercarriage struts look very much like that in the photo above. I've isolated the strut from the rest of the background so that it's shape might be more easily made out. What do you think? |
|
The Tailfin
Picture of tailplane with RAF finflash. Note base colour is Black. I feel that the following picture comparisons lend further weight to the wreck
Here's a photo of a Coastal Command Brigand
Above on the left, I have zoomed in on one of the rudders, while on the right is the picture of the wreck's tailfin, rotated to the vertical and distracting background is removed. I have labelled the corresponding similar parts in both tailplanes. The indentation in the rudder, as well as the Square hole, are very distinctive features of the twin tailplanes, which leads me to the conclusion that our wreck is indeed a Bristol Brigand. I also received an email from aviation enthusiast Wong Lai-Toon (who grew up in Ipoh) that corroborates this: "Hi there Sunny, This is Lai-Toon emailing you from Fremont. I am almost sure that you are correct as my dad, who was in the Home Guard as a sergeant during the days of the British involvement in the suppression of the commies during the late 40's to late 50's in the Perak region. Thanks for your email, Lai-Toon! Well, there you have it folks! Is the proof conclusive enough? What do you think? Send email |